Thursday, November 7, 2013

Veterans, activists speak out against DHS, Urban Shield

Fear shades of Boston Marathon bombing

DHS is funding a multi-million dollar evolution of its multi-year, multi-state, multi-agency Operation Urban Shield in the D/FW Metroplex Nov. 7-10...

Cytel Group, Inc., a Department of Homeland Security training coordinator headquartered near Oakland, California, is the training agency with the contract to do the exercise.

According to a Cytel Group, the company organized the same type of operation at Boston, just previous to the marathon bombing: http://www.cytelgroup.com (click here to see the company's website)


Mission Control: Emergency Operations Center at Alameda County Sheriff's Department where Sheriff Greg Ahern rides herd on Operation Urban Shield for Cytel Group, Inc. They are ramrodding the op for North Central Texas Council of Governments in the 16-county area surrounding the D/FW Metroplex.

Mission Control at Dublin, CA, Cytel's
 headquarters near Oakland
How much does a multi-state, multi-year, multi-agency operation like Urban Shield cost taxpayers? That's classified, but here's a clue. According to a recent article about the U.S. Senate, Minority Leader Mitch McConnell's whiskey-making state of Kentucky realizes about $1.00 for every 0.66 cents paid in federal taxes across the board. Go figure.


If in need of personal guidance, refer to Mr. James Madison's master work, the “Bill of Rights,” the first 10 amendments to the U.S. Constitution:


Wednesday, November 6, 2013

The worm turns: Social media defers tax board election

A tale of two governments

McLennan County, TX – Both the Commissioners Court and the Robinson City Council were prepared on Tuesday to cast their ballots for the board of McLennan County Appraisal District – popularly known as McAd.

McLennan County Commissioner Kelly Snell
Both deferred until a later time when members of the public became acutely aware of the process by which the nominees are selected, how the votes are apportioned among taxing entities of cities, school districts, and the County Commissioners Court and how the biennial rubber stamping process proceeds – the way it's been done for decades upon decades.

All of them use tax appraisal to write themselves checks, checks the property owners are obliged to cash – or else face punitive tax liens and litigation.

But it came to a screeching halt on Tuesday when County Commissioner Kelly Snell put his foot down for the second time in a subsequent election cycle and demanded that people who would like to be nominated for the job be vetted – in private because it's a personnel matter.

Nevertheless, two of the taxing entities did slow the process down for at least long enough to talk it over – with a difference.

County Commissioners make a big, fine salary – somewhere in the neighborhood of a hundred grand a year.

City Councilmen are unpaid.

The unpaid city councilmen followed the salaried board's lead, and the rest is history.

Click here for the journalism of R.S. Gates, a social media activist who has compiled a Facebook rundown on how the nomination and election process is structured, and how it operates:



A modest proposal from the Stinking Badges


Six Shooter Junction - According to the Lib Trib, 19th District Court Judge Ralph Strother allows prosecutors to carry hawg legs in the courtroom - for self defense, rattlesnakes and such.

Judge Matt Johnson of the 54th District Court says there is an "unwritten rule" that states only peace officers are allowed to pack iron in court.

How say y'all, oh, noble and enlightened readers of this mighty organ of public opinion?

Chief Prosecutor Michael Jarret experienced an accidental discharge when he took a fellow prosecutor's word that the Glock .40 he was checking out in the office was not loaded. When he racked the slide, he chambered a round, then pulled the trigger. It blew a hole in the window and made an impact on a brick wall across the air shaft.

His boss man, District Attorney Abel Reyna, says he's still angry about that. Whatever he does about it will be private, though, because it's a personnel matter.

I put it to you. If prosecutors are allowed to carry pistols in court, should they be unloaded? Or should the prosecutors always assume that a firearm - any firearm - is loaded?

Phone in your thoughts to Shawn Warner at KWTX "Talk of the Town" Radio. He'll be glad to hear from you, no doubt. Tell Mr. Warner the Stinking Badges sent you. 

Tuesday, November 5, 2013

AG opens crack in stone wall around Grisham arrest

Belton – Assistant County Attorney Darrell Guess was livid, visibly angered as he handed over an open records letter ruling from the Attorney General's office.

According to that letter, dated October 29, citizens are one step closer to knowing the truth about an arrest of man who was walking down a public road with a loaded rifle, an act allowed by both the U.S. and Texas Constitution.

In order to continue stonewalling the public about the conduct of Temple Police Officer Steve Ermis when he arrested M/Sgt. C.J. Grisham on May 16 by refusing to release a dashcam video recording, prosecutors will be obliged to file suit by Monday in Travis County, if they wish to comply with a 10-day deadline and receive the full protection of the subsection of the Texas Open Records Act that governs matters of this type.

An Assistant Attorney General, Megan Holloway, cited a failure on the part of prosecutors to comply with procedural deadlines.

As a result, Ms. Holloway added, both the Attorney General's office and requestors previously denied access to the information, which is normally considered public, and routinely released upon written request by law enforcement agencies statewide, will have the opportunity to sue Bell County for the release of the information if they so choose.

She said that a “failure to comply results in the legal presumption the requested information is public and must be released unless a compelling reason exists to withhold the information from disclosure.”

Though Mr. Guess has said he is in possession of a court order from retired visiting Harris County Court at Law Judge Neel D. Richardson sealing the material, he has yet to produce that order.

Spectators in open court have been prevented from seeing the video, which, according to those who have witnessed it, depicts the veteran officer jamming the muzzle of a semiautomatic pistol into the back of the Sergeant's neck, bending him over the hood of a patrol car, then jabbing him in the ribs under his left armpit with the gun as he takes his AR-15 assault rifle away from him.

Sgt. Grisham is charged with interfering with the appointed duties of a public official. His trial for the Class B Misdemeanor offense resulted in a mistrial when jurors were unable to reach unanimous agreement based in part on the dashcam video and other evidence presented in a week-long trial in October. An active duty Army enlisted man with many overseas deployments in his previous career, he is assigned to a military intelligence unit stationed at Ft. Hood.

Assistant Attorney General Megan Holloway answered a challenge to the previous ruling handed down by the AG's office by acknowledging that it is legal to withhold the material because “We have no indication there has been any change in the law, facts, or circumstances on which the previous ruling was based. Accordingly, we conclude the County Attorney's office may rely on (the previous ruling)...and withhold the submitted dash camera video...”

However, as of the date of this letter, you have not submitted to this office a copy of the written request for information...” It is that failure that triggers “certain deadlines” that will land Bell County in court defending its actions, even though certain “discretionary exceptions” existed in the first place.

Thus we have no choice but to order the remaining submitted information released...”

Reached for comment, one requestor, investigative journalist R.S. Gates, said “It's always a good day when you prevail.” A former police officer who recently lost his reserve officer status due to controversial investigations he has carried out on behalf of taxpayers and gun rights enthusiasts, he added, “I tell you, when the AG says you screwed up, it's nothing more than dogged determination. Their arrogance trips them up every time.”


He said he is unsure at this time if he will join a suit or file a petition on his own behalf.

Open carry activist promotes jury nullification

Jury Nullification: A sanctioned doctrine of trial proceedings wherein members of a jury disregard either the evidence presented or the instructions of the judge in order to reach a verdict based upon their own consciences. It espouses the concept that jurors should be the judges of both law and fact.

Mesquite, TX – David Gerber sees himself doing something to change the course of history.

He is taking up a collection to educate the venire from which the County Court at Law jury of six registered voters will be chosen in the re-trial of C.J. Grisham following his October mistrial over a misdemeanor case in which he is charged with carrying a loaded firearm on a rural road.

Temple, Texas city police arrested him and confiscated his weapons, an AR-15 assault rifle and a semiautomatic .45 caliber Kimber concealment model handgun, for which he holds a concealed carry handgun license.

M/Sgt. Grisham is accused of violating a statute that prohibits interfering with a public official carrying out his appointed duties. A Class B misdemeanor filed in Bell County Court at Law, heard by a visiting jurist from Harris County, upon conviction, it carries the maximum penalty of a $2,000 fine and six months in the County jail.

Police originally charged him with resisting arrest, then with a violation of the disorderly conduct statute by “rudely carrying” a firearm “in a manner calculated to cause alarm.”

Prosecutors have stated they intend to re-try the case in a change of venue at an undisclosed location outside of Bell County.

Mr. Gerber's mission is to send printed material to the registered voters named in the venire who are designated for jury selection in the case, which is tentatively scheduled for December 16 in an undisclosed location.

His goal is to raise $1,200 for printing and postage, and to obtain the mailing list from the Bell County Clerk's office.

The material will state that “Every single day in America, people are convicted of "crimes" simply because the members of the jury were not made aware that they had the RIGHT to disregard the instructions of the Judge and/or the law itself if they feel that either is in conflict with morality or the Constitution of The United States of America.”

Jury nullification is a concept used with great effect in western states such as Montana and Idaho when prosecutors bring charges for marijuana or gun violations. The goal is to make it impossible to select a jury from a venire of prospective panelists who refuse to acknowledge during voir dire examination that they will be able to render a verdict based solely on the judge's instructions, and upon the facts as presented through witness testimony and the introduction of evidence during the trial.

Those who indicate during questioning by prosecuting attorneys that they will not be able to render a verdict based solely on the facts are dismissed for cause, for which there is an unlimited number of challenges.

In many cases, the prosecution gives up pursuit of their cases when it becomes obvious there is no way they can easily select a jury panel.

To contact Mr. Gerber with a donation, one need only visit his website at Jury Education and Awareness Campaign:


Nullification is a concept introduced by Messrs. James Madison and Thomas Jefferson during the ratification of the U.S. Constitution, particularly in the western states of Kentucky and Ohio. They were able to convince state legislators who feared a central government that could become too strong that the extraordinary powers vested in the federal government could be curbed through three forms of nullification.

  1. Legislative action
  2. Judge-made case law
  3. Jury nullification

To further their interests, they had the Constitutional Convention insert the Tenth Amendment, which reserves all powers not granted to the federal government by the U.S. Constitution to the states.

Many experts, including Texas Land Commissioner Jerry Patterson, author of the Texas Concealed Handgun statute, consider city and county ordinances drafted to outlaw carrying firearms openly to be unconstitutional; they have called for action and more action to nullify these laws.

He is a GOP candidate for Lieutenant Governor, and as Land Commissioner granted permission for Open Carry activists to rally at the Alamo in support of gun rights on October 19.

Gun confiscation by Mexican authorities was a major cassus belli in the Texas Revolution, he noted in public remarks he made on that day.



Sunday, November 3, 2013

Redneck Mother at 40 - 11/1/13

Ray Wylie Hubbard's Redneck Mother story
The year was 1973, Lukenbach, Texas, cosmic cowboys, and the works


When he strolled into Al's Tokio Store, Ray Wylie Hubbard stepped back into time 40 years to recall the actual "combat conditions" that led to his hit song and a career that has led to some strange innings and triumphant returns. He eighty-sixed the camera following the interview because, he said, he was fixin' to play a dozen new ones and his record company says it's a no-no. Here's Mr. Hubbard doing the old standby, complete with the second verse he dictated to Jerry Jeff Walker over the phone at the recording studio in Lukenbach, Texas, that well-known spot on the map.

Saturday, November 2, 2013

From the legalistic fog of mumbo jumbo jive

Public tax info very hard to get 

Take a letter, Maria
Address it to my wife.
Send a copy to my lawyer
gotta find a new life... - a moldy oldie

Six Shooter Junction – It came to pass that tax man Buddy Skeen, one of the last of the Democrats still in the courthouse, went to the pen, they replaced him with another bean counter, and the people with the shekels rejoiced.

And then – it came time to vote in the same old same old, and everything came off the rails when this bright young man stepped and started asking questions – in the name of THE LAW!

From: R.S. Gates  
Sent: Monday, October 28, 2013 10:45 AM
To: Ben Masters
Subject: Request

To: Chief Appraiser
I am making application for and requesting access to the following information:
1.       The current taxing unit voting entitlements.
2.       Minutes where the current taxing unit voting entitlements was approved by the board.
3.       Public information related to the vacancy on the Board of Directors due to the departure of Buddy Skeen.
4.       Any e-mail, memo, note or directive related to the current voting unit entitlements not being furnished in response to the previous public information act request.

Thank you,
R.S. Gates

And then – we all found out – it's not all that simple, you see. There is the advice of the district's attorneys after they have been asked to advise the tax appraisers on tax appraisal, and it looks like we're definitely expecting rain – over here.

From: Ben Masters
Sent: 11/1/2013 10:22 AM
To: R.S. Gates
Subject: MCAD - Response to your 10-31-13 e-mail

Mr. Gates:

The district has consulted with its attorneys as to your request for public information concerning the forwarding of an email. Based upon the advice of the district’s attorneys, the district is requesting an attorney general’s decision as to whether the district may release the requested information. A copy of the district’s request to the attorney general will be sent as required in the statue.

Since the matter has now been referred to the district’s attorneys, any further inquiries concerning this  request should be directed to Mr. Matthew Tepper, Attorney at Law, 700 Jeffrey Way, Suite 100. Round Rock, Texas 78665, 512-323-3200.


Ben Masters Jr.
Director of Technology and Appraisal Support
McLennan County Appraisal District

From: R.S. Gates  
Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2013 4:15 PM
To: Ben Masters
Subject: RE: MCAD - Request Recieved

Mr. Masters,

I was able to compose an e-mail and attach another e-mail in under a minute. I am interested if each refusal to provide the requested information constitutes a separate violation of the act. See: 

Sec. 552.353.  FAILURE OR REFUSAL OF OFFICER FOR PUBLIC INFORMATION TO PROVIDE ACCESS TO OR COPYING OF PUBLIC INFORMATION.  (a)  An officer for public information, or the officer's agent, commits an offense if, with criminal negligence, the officer or the officer's agent fails or refuses to give access to, or to permit or provide copying of, public information to a requestor as provided by this chapter.

Please provide the basis for your refusal to provide the requested information.

Thank you

Here's how they handled it last time, way back before Buddy Skeen got sent away to do time for being a Democrat and trading pickups with car dealers and his staff in - ah, well, ahem - innovative ways that upset the Tea Party...

Click here, please...