Michael Morton, his son, and wife Christine |
Court hearing to determine penalty
Austin – A state district judge will soon hold hearings to determine if a former prosecutor should be reprimanded or lose his license to practice law for withholding evidence that led to the false conviction of a man accused of murdering his wife in 1987.
Austin – A state district judge will soon hold hearings to determine if a former prosecutor should be reprimanded or lose his license to practice law for withholding evidence that led to the false conviction of a man accused of murdering his wife in 1987.
Former prosecutor District Judge Ken Anderson |
Michael
Morton gained his release from the penitentiary in October of last
year when the results of a DNA test showed that he could not have
been guilty of beating his wife Christine to death while their
3-year-old son watched. He served nearly 25 years for a crime the
State of Texas now admits he did not commit.
In
a taped interview between Mr. Morton's mother-in-law and Williamson
County lead investigator Don Wood, she revealed that the little boy
told her that a “monster” who had “red hands” got mad at his
mother and killed her with a bludgeon made from a piece of wood.
He
told his grandmother that his father was not home at the time of the
attack.
Judge
Anderson, who was then a prosecutor and thus obliged to turn over any
exculpatory evidence requested in a discovery motion from defense
attorneys, failed to reveal the existence of the interview, along
with a total of 5 such items of evidence that would have cleared Mr. Morton, according to the State Bar investigation.
He
is charged with five violations of the rules of professional conduct
for attorneys.
Judge
Anderson faces a range of punishment that involves an array of
penalties including a public reprimand, or the loss of his license to
practice law. That penalty would automatically disqualify him for re-election as a District Judge in a court of original jurisdiction which
decides the fate of defendants similarly accused of crimes, or a
finder of fact empowered to rule in cases involving defendants
charged with civil wrongs and complaints.
Τhanks for sharing such а good thinκing, ρіece of writіng is fastidious, thats
ReplyDeletewhy і have read it completely
My website > No BS Suggestions For Smarter Workouts