Temple
– Police in this city have instituted a new policy. When Open Carry
– Temple and Dontcomply.com activists visit a place of business on
their armed walks, they counsel the owner to bar them from carrying
weapons.
Activists
say some business operators are following the suggestion, while others
continue to open their doors to those who choose to go armed.
Murdoch Pizgatti of dontcomply.com |
It's
all part of a bitter dispute in which the authorities claim that
carrying a long gun such as a rifle or shotgun in public – though
there is no law against it – is an alarming thing, something that
should not be done.
Following
the March arrest of Army Master Sgt. C.J. Grisham under a disorderly
conduct statute in which he was charged with carrying a gun in a
manner “calculated to alarm,” the matter has escalated.
Activists
have staged armed marches in dozens of Texas cities, including
Austin, Dallas, San Antonio, Ft. Worth, Houston, Waxahachie, Belton,
as well as Temple.
Recently, a former police officer who is now a law student published information accusing a co-founder of the movement, who goes by Murdoch Pizgatti, of being disallowed to possess firearms due to a 2009 conviction for assault causes bodily injury in a domesticviolence case. (click here to read the blog post)
The
author of the blog, who remains anonymous, says the Little Elm
resident received a 20-month sentence of probation and a 5-year ban
on possession of firearms.
He
says his real name is Phoenix Walter Horton, born 4/26/1984, and that
he is in violation not of rude display of a weapon, but a violation
of the probation laws and federal regulations.
“Now
having said all of this, Horton would be committing an offense if he
carried his rifle, but not Disorderly Conduct. According to
publicly available records on the Denton County website, Horton was
convicted of Assault with Bodily Injury – Family Violence in Denton
County, Texas
on cause number CR-2006-03330-A on July 3, 2007 by a jury and
sentenced to 20 months probation. He was released from
probation on March 10, 2009. Unlawful Possession of a Firearm
prohibits Horton from possess a firearm until five years after his
release from probation, or March 10, 2014. Tex. Pen. Code Ann.
§ 46.04(b)(2); Worley
v. State,
No. 01-03-00329-CR, 2004 Tex. App. LEXIS 3271 (Tex. App.–Houston
[1st Dist.] 2004, pet. ref’d) (not designated for publication).
It is also a violation of federal law. 18 U.S.C.S. § 922(g).
So while Horton would not be committing Disorderly Conduct, he would
be subject to arrest.”
CR-2006-03330A |
Horton,
Phoenix Walter
04/26/1984 |
04/26/2006
County
Criminal Court #1
Crouch,
Jim E |
Adult
Misdemeanor
Inactive:
Disposed |
ASSLT CAUSES BODILY INJURY FAMILY VIOLENCE |
“Everyone
on the internet thinks they're a detective...To be clear, Phoenix is
part of dontcomply.com Hint: Phoenix has two brothers. What a piece
of crap cop to slander people with bad information."
It's
a bone of contention in the ongoing dispute with police, who insist
on seeing photo identification immediately when they begin to talk to
a gun-toting activist. Their reason? They want to see if there is any
reason the individual may not have a firearm due to previous felony
conviction, mental difficulties, or a record of domestic violence.
An activist visiting Convenience Bank at Wal-Mart |
The
activists disagree. They say they don't have to produce
identification unless they have been charged with a crime. Then, and
only then, if it can be proven they did not give their true identity,
they can be charged with the misdemeanor crime of failure to
identify.
In
this YouTube video Mr. Pizgatti made of a visit police officers made
to his home, one may hear their typical arguments against the
practice of parading through the streets carrying a weapon.
'What
are we attempting to achieve here?'
In
another encounter, M/Sgt. C.J. Grisham confronts a Temple police
officer, Sgt. T. Simeroth, at a board meeting of Open Carry Temple.
In
their long, rambling conversation, the policeman attempts to explain
that though he is a hearty supporter of the Second Amendment right to
keep and bear arms, “The demographics have changed.” He argues
that many people have moved into Texas from other areas, that they
are easily alarmed by the appearance of citizens strolling the
streets and roads with assault rifles slung over their shoulders, or
going into places of business armed.
At
one point, he counters the Army sergeant's argument that the U.S.
Constitution allows people to keep and bear arms by saying, “The
constitution can be changed.”
“It's
not,” Grisham replies, with blunt and forceful tone.
The
video is lengthy, but it provides a fascinating snapshot of the true
attitudes and beliefs displayed by two diametrically opposed camps.
'The
demographics have changed.'
No comments:
Post a Comment