Stays
order 90 days for appeal
The constitution was not written for 1776; it was written to withstand the test of time...
The constitution was not written for 1776; it was written to withstand the test of time...
San
Francisco – When federal agents sweep into a bank, phone company or
internet service provider, they inform the management that if they
reveal their searches and seizures, they will be charged with a
crime.
“National
Security Letters” place a severe limit on the freedom of speech
clause of the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, according to
a ruling by a U.S. District Court Judge.
The practice - and many others - began with the passage of the Patriot Act following the 9/11 attacks, designed to fight terrorism.(click here) Personal intelligence thus secretly gleaned is often used against persons in cases unrelated to national security, according to plaintiffs in a federal lawsuit.
The practice - and many others - began with the passage of the Patriot Act following the 9/11 attacks, designed to fight terrorism.(click here) Personal intelligence thus secretly gleaned is often used against persons in cases unrelated to national security, according to plaintiffs in a federal lawsuit.
While customers go uninformed, those who have received the national
security letter – and the accompanying threat – are prevented
from informing their customers as to what happened. Government agents must reverse that policy, ordered Judge
Susan Illston on Friday. She gave the Department of Justice 90 days
to appeal the ruling. The prohibitive order takes effect in 90 days.
In 2011, the FBI made 16,511 letter requests for information on 7,201people, demanding unlimited information on bank accounts, the contents of safe deposit boxes, phone calls, e-mails, stock trades, retirement accounts mortgages and loans, and credit card purchases.(click here for a previous report)
“This
pervasive use of non-disclosure orders, coupled with the government's
failure to demonstrate that a blanket prohibition on recipients'
ability to disclose the mere fact of receipt of an NSL is necessary
to serve the compelling need of national security, creates too large
a danger that speech is being unnecessarily restricted,” Judge
Illston said.
The ruling came in a lawsuit filed by the internet rights group,Electronic Freedom Foundation. (click here for more information about the foundation and its program of electronic surveillance self defense)
No comments:
Post a Comment