Paralyzed veteran with no illusions about law
“Whether
you agree with who they are, where they live or how they carry, it’s
still their right. We’re not giving people the right to carry, they
already have the right to open carry.” - Missouri State
Representative expressing the right to defend one self, as bestowed
by Deity...
Austin,
TX – On Friday the 13th,
Gary Hays made a medical appointment at the VA Hospital in Temple,
then hitched a ride, wheelchair and all, to the State Capital.
His
errand – to be arrested for displaying a firearm or other deadly
weapon in a public place in a manner calculated to cause alarm – is
expressly intended as a test of the Disorderly Conduct statute,
Section 42.01 (a)(8) of the Texas Penal Code.
Mr.
Hays is a Vietnam-era veteran of the Army, a quadriplegic paralyzed
in an auto accident 10 years ago who is confined to a wheelchair.
He
is also a member of Open Carry Texas, two other members of which made
the same choice, to be arrested by Troopers of the Department of
Public Safety who patrol the Capital grounds. Those two men have been
released on personal recognizance bond for a nominal fee. Mr. Hays,
on the other hand, does not wish to be set free. Prominent
conservative politicians immediately came to their defense, men such
as Republican Governor candidate Tom Pauken of Dallas, a veteran of
Army Intelligence and the Reagan White House, who said, “Today,
two Texans were arrested near the state Capitol grounds for
possessing firearms.
“It
is my understanding that they both were carrying antique black-powder
pistol replicas, which are legal to carry under Texas law.
“I’m
calling for the release of these two citizens who posed no danger to
other individuals and were only exercising their rights as protected
under the U.S. Constitution and Texas laws.”
Gary
Hays said, “I've been imprisoned by this paralyzed body for 10
years. They can't do anything to me.”
According
to his wife, Marcy Hays, he is held in a single cell in the Travis
County Jail.
He
is nothing less than objective about his status. Where others are
quick to insist that his arrest was an illegal act of a despotic
government, he told me, “The law says 'displays a firearm or other
deadly weapon in a public place in a manner calculated to cause
alarm...” There is no dispute that a Colt revolver is a deadly
weapon, according to Gary Hays.
It
is the “intent” portion of the law that is under challenge, in
his opinion. It's strange to watch videos of Mr. Hays in conference
with the DPS Troopers. Unlike other activists, there is no posturing,
no strutting or preening in defiance. The cops kneel or squat by his
wheelchair to confer with him in low tones. They are men in
conference. Respect is mutual. Courtesy is an utmost and mutual
observance.
Mr.
Hays spent most of the day Friday in conference with insurance plan
representatives who sell legal protection for firearms-related
offenses. It was his concern that he might not be eligible for legal
services because his choice of weapon, an 1851 Colt Navy Revolver in
.44 caliber, is not legally classified as a firearm in Texas. Once he
had determined that he could obtain legal services to challenge the
law, he made his choice, solicited a ride to Austin, and put his plan
into effect.
It
wasn't his first brush with the troopers at the Capital. The previous
Friday, September 6, he carried the same weapon inside the rotunda
entrance and was admonished to leave and put it back in his vehicle.
He
refused. At that point, a trooper gave him a warning citation after
Mr. Hays, several troopers and the one who gave him the warning read
the black and white letter of the law and realized – unexpectedly –
that, indeed, a replica of a black powder revolver of a type
manufactured prior to 1899 is classified as a weapon, not a firearm.
In
a video made at the time, surprise enters the voices of the troopers
as they read the statute. It's an impromptu lesson in law, taught on the
steps of the temple, the palace of law.
He
vowed to return, and with predictable results, caused himself to be arrested
for the Class B misdemeanor offense of disorderly conduct.
One
is tempted to recall the myth of the unlucky status of that day,
Friday, October 13, 1307, when the Office of the Inquisition arrested
the Grand Master Jacques DeMolay and other officers of the Poor
Fellow Soldiers of Christ of the Temple of Solomon, the Knights
Templar, at their Commandery in Paris and other locations in Europe,
placed them in chains, and charged them various acts of sacrilege and
perversion.
But
this story involves much more than that. This is America, where the
mythology of the six gun, the “world's right arm,” is deeply
etched in the oral history of a violent past, one populated by
veterans of a vicious civil war, including General George Armstrong
Custer, Jesse James, and hundreds of thousands of others who headed
west.
Men
like James Butler, better known as “Wild Bill” Hickok, the Army
scout and freighter, Deputy U.S. Marshal and renowned gunfighter and
gambler, wrote the legend large and bloody. Hickok reportedly once
shot a man at the incredible distance of 75 yards with a Navy Colt,
killing him with one shot.
Today,
the likes of Master Sergeant C.J. Grisham challenge the government's
right to limit the right of the people to keep and bear arms. He is
joined by numerous other men, proponents of national organizations
such as the Tenth Amendment Center, and Oathkeepers, all of which are
pushing for nullification of the more than 22,000 firearms laws on
the books in favor of a strict construction of the Second Amendment,
which plainly states the right of the people to keep and bear arms
“shall not be infringed.”
Names
such as Rosa Parks and Martin Luther King, Jr., are mentioned in the
same breath with those of the founding fathers.
They
side with former Presidents James Madison and Thomas Jefferson, who
held that the people have the right as an undisputed grant from
Almighty God, a guarantee that they may defend themselves by any
means necessary, regardless of government approval or disapproval.
It
is a season to make law. Sgt. Grisham will be tried for a similar
offense charged in March on September 23 in Bell County Court at Law
in Belton.
Battle
lines have formed.
Here
are three additional tests of the laws governing open carry of
sidearms that will challenge a doctrine of intent, all part of a
national trend in which a nation is struggling to arm itself against
the wishes of the practitioners of law and order.
This is a very nice, well thought out summary of the events. But the main point of the entire matter is our RIGHTS as Citizens to not be held to a different level or status than those that are here to serve us....that being the POLICE and our ELECTED REPRESENTATIVES!! Are we in a state where all of those that write and enforce the laws are ruling over US?
ReplyDelete