Anatomy of a sweetheart deal |
A
corporate entity is formed to obtain underwriting of tax-free
municipal bonds issued to finance building a public project – in
this case, a jail.
These
are revenue bonds, and they are issued under the authority of the
governing body – in this case, the McLennan County Commissioners
Court. No general obligation bond election is required for their
approval.
The
public project in question is a jail built to be operated by a
private corporation – CEC, Inc. - to produce a revenue stream that
will pay the debt service on the bond issue.
Why
would this be necessary?
The
Texas Commission on Jail Standards has stringent requirements as to
the amount of space each inmate is given in which to live in three
dimensions – both square and cubic footage. They must also be
separated by gender by sight and sound, their safety guaranteed by
automatic smoke and fire detection equipment. There is a minimum
staff to inmate ratio, and it's expensive.
If
you don't have enough space that comes up to those standards, you are
required to send those inmates to another facility that does comply –
at a hefty per diem price. The choice: hire more corrections officers, or build a jail for a private corporation to operate.
Problem.
But
the for-profit jail built to take care of prisoner overflow for other
counties, the federal government and other states is nearly empty,
and that is even more expensive. Suddenly, the project that would
cost taxpayers nothing is very, very expensive.
Taxpayers
are still liable to pay for the debt service on the nearly $50
million bond issue.
But
CEC, Inc., has a contract to operate the old jail adjacent to the
Courthouse. They had a number of federal prisoners, which they
boarded there.
What
to do?
They
moved them to the new Jack Harwell Detention Center and closed their
operation at the old jail downtown.
McLennanCounty was left with a space problemm of its own. The Sheriff'sOffice is not always able to cover its obligations to legally houseMcLennan County's prisoners at the Highway 6 County Jail, and withits downtown jail closed, they send them to the Jack HarwellDetention Center – at a price of $45.50 per day.(click here for a previous report)
Everyone
who is responsible says that no one knew this would all become so
expensive.
Itcost about $2 million more to pay CEC, Inc., for “outside care”of county prisoners during 2012 than the budget office estimated, sothe money had to come from somewhere. They transferred it in – amonth at a time – and now it's time to plan for FY 2013.(click here for a report on the "Perfect Storm" of the jail budget shortfall)
The
problem wouldn't be so expensive if only the Commissioners Court knew
what it will take to re-open the downtown jail, which is still going
through a renovation program that cost $1.1 million.
In
fact, this is such a mystery that most members of the Court thought
the project had been mandated by an order of the Texas Commission on
Jail Standards.
Asit turns out, that's not true. The state jail commission says theoperating permit and plan is still in place. No sweat. Localofficials just hauled off and ordered the remodeling project becausethe old jail would be shut down, anyway.(click here for a report on the matter)
But
it's still shut down, and it's even more mysterious than the reasons
for its remodeling.
CEC,
Inc., is responsible, and they aren't communicating.
So,
how much will it cost to free up more space to cut down on the budget
for “outside care?”
There
is a “best estimate” from Building Supervisor Sammy Sykora of
“between $100,000 and $200,000.”
That's
only a $100,000 variable – plus or minus – but which is it?
Here's
an audio of the resulting discussion from last week.
Today's
budget workshop and tomorrow's Commissioner Court meeting is decision
time on what to do.
Raise
taxes by 6 percent, or cut spending and find a surplus? Pick one.
Oneexpense that is on the chopping block is the annual contribution tothe Waco-McLennan County Economic Development Commission'sfund of $6.5 million that is used to attract industrial employerssuch as Caterpillar and other multinationals to the local industrial park.(click here for a previous report)
The
guiding principle: broaden the employment base to expand the tax base
through “investment” of tax dollars.
That's
how they put it when the Chamber of Commerce is driving the deal.
When
a consumer goes through debt counseling mandated by a bankruptcy
judge, the smart money says you can't borrow your way out of debt.
Now,
there's one for you.
Here's
what the Tea Party is saying:
There
is a “fluff” factor in the County budget of 16.5 percent. Those
are figures that are budgeted, but not spent. On top of that,
property appraisals are up 9.5 percent, and the Court wants to go up
on the tax rate by 6 percent.
Said
Waco Tea Party co-founder Michael Simon in public comments last week,
“Your first obligation is to the taxpayers, not to the Chamber of
Commerce.”
No comments:
Post a Comment