Activists cry foul over last minute change
Washington – Minority advocates decry a sudden federal reversal of earlier refusals to make immigration databases available to election judges nationwide.
Representatives
of the Department of Homeland Security who notified officials in
Florida last week that the rolls that will show if a non-citizen has
wound up on the voting rolls suddenly announced on Monday that all
other states will be able to get the information.
Elections
leaders in Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, Georgia, Iowa, Kansas,
Michigan, New Mexico, Ohio and Utah signed onto a request by Colorado
Secretary of State Scott Gessler.
Five
of the states - Colorado, Iowa, Michigan, New Mexico and Ohio - are
expected to be competitive in the 2012 presidential race. Each of the
election chiefs in those states is Republican.
The
data work is supposed to help states identify people who may be legal
residents but not citizens. Since states can't monitor whether
someone has become a citizen, the federal database will allow them to
check the immigration status of those people.
Colorado
has identified some 5,000 people that it wants to check.
The
Obama administration had denied Florida's request for database access
amid an escalating legal battle with Florida about how it was
handling its voter list. A U.S. judge blocked federal attempts to
stop Florida's voter review, and the federal government then relented
on the database question.
Washington
state has been requesting the data since back to the Bush
administration. Shane Hamlin, the co-director of elections in
Washington, said state officials aren't getting full access to the
database that they had sought but that they were pleased with the
development.
To
check against the database, states will have to provide a "unique
identifier," such as an "alien number," for each
person in question. Alien numbers generally are assigned to
foreigners living in the country legally, often with visas or other
permits such as green cards.
The
database isn't likely to catch illegal immigrants who may have
managed to get on the voter rolls, since those individuals likely
wouldn't have an alien number.
Voting
rights groups are concerned that the erroneous voter purges right now
could make it difficult to correct mistakes in time for the election.
Meanwhile,
both Hispanic and black activists as well as white conservatives
eagerly await the ruling expected in August of a three-judge panel in
Washington, D.C., regarding the legality of the new Texas Voter ID
law.
Both
sides accuse the other of using deeply "flawed" data to
show whether minorities would be unfairly hurt by a photo ID
requirement.
The
Justice Department said in court that about 1.5 million registered
Texas voters don't have state-issued photo IDs, and that a
disproportionate share of those voters are Hispanic or black. But
Texas attorneys noted that the Justice Department didn't take into
account whether those voters might have passports or citizenship
papers, which are also acceptable ID.
Texas
officials also argued that the federal government's numbers were
inflated because the state's voter registration database is filled
with errors. They said it includes the names of tens of thousands of
voters who have either died or moved out of state.
And
lawyers for Texas argued that it's difficult to match names on the
registration lists with motor vehicle records — which the Justice
Department did — because people use different versions of their
names.
To
make the point, the Texas lawyers noted that former President George
W. Bush and Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison are both on the DOJ's list of
those who could be affected by the law, even though both presumably
have photo ID. In this case, the burden of proof is on Texas to show
that its law would not be discriminatory.
No comments:
Post a Comment